Satellite-detected oil-gas methane point sources emitted 7.6 Tg y-1 in 2025

By modeling how often satellites miss small emissions, the authors estimate annual methane output for 1924 oil-gas point sources, finding higher persistence and higher emissions than earlier estimates.

EarthArXiv 2 min read Preprint

Why it matters

Satellites see only brief snapshots of methane plumes, yet inventories need yearly averages. This method turns sparse, open-access plume data into annual rates for individual sources. The results suggest many large sources are underestimated or missing in a bottom-up inventory built from national reports.

What they did

The authors used plume observations and clear-sky non-detections from Sentinel-2, Landsat, EnMAP, PRISMA, EMIT and Tanager, compiled by UNEP’s IMEO and Carbon Mapper. They fit a probability of detection (POD) for each instrument with Bayesian inference. They adjusted it locally using background noise maps from EMIT and Sentinel-2. For each source and year they combined the emission rate distribution, local wind speed and persistence into an annual mean rate.

Key findings

  • The fitted PODs are lower than those commonly reported from controlled releases under favorable conditions.
  • Annual mean rates were estimated for 1924 individual sources. Detected point sources totaled 7.6 Tg y-1 in 2025, and 245 sources emitted more than 1 ton h-1 on an annual basis.
  • 18% of sources detected in 2022-2024 were not detected in later years. Of 78 sources detected in 2022, 47 were detected in all four years.
  • Counting emissions below the detection threshold gives a mean persistence of 51%, and 56% in 2023. Jervis et al. (2025) reported 16%.
  • Estimates correlate weakly with the GFEI v3 inventory (r = 0.18) and are 2.5-fold larger on average in observed grid cells. Adding missing point sources would raise GFEI by 5.8 Tg y-1 (14%).

Limitations

  • Error on annual rates averages 67%, mostly from the lognormal fit. Individual estimates are therefore uncertain.
  • The POD is derived from detections only, so it overstates a satellite’s true global detection ability. Offshore sources and low-wind observations are excluded, and cloudy tropical basins are poorly observed.
  • Agreement with the GHGSat estimates is modest (r = 0.36). The method assumes ergodicity and that local noise ratios from EMIT and Sentinel-2 apply to the other instruments.

Glossary

  • Probability of detection (POD): The chance that an instrument detects a plume of a given emission size.
  • Persistence: The fraction of time a source is actually emitting.
  • Plume-imaging satellite: A satellite that images methane plumes from individual sources using sunlight reflected in shortwave infrared.
  • GFEI: The Global Fuel Exploitation Inventory, a bottom-up map of fossil fuel methane emissions based on national reports.

Original paper

Annual mean methane emissions from individual oil-gas point sources worldwide inferred from multi-satellite plume-imaging observations

East. James D., Jacob. Daniel J., Kamdar. Harshil M., Jack Bruno, Estrada. Lucas A., Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate, San Martin. Manuel Montesino, Juan Emmanuel Johnson, Gonzalo Mateo Garcia, Dylan Jervis, Varon. Daniel J., Vassiliki Mancoridis, Cusworth. Daniel H, Reidy. Emily K., Yuanlei Chen

EarthArXiv · 30 September 2026

Read the original paper Licence: see terms · doi:10.31223/x5hf8k

This paper is a preprint. It has not been peer reviewed, and its results may change.

AI-generated summary of the original article; changes were made. Check the original before relying on it.